Optimal Design for Human Preference Elicitation

Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Anusha Lalitha, Kousha Kalantari, Aniket Deshmukh, Ge Liu +2 more
4/22/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Learning of preference models from human feedback has been central to recent advances in artificial intelligence. Motivated by the cost of obtaining high-quality human annotations, we study efficient human preference elicitation for learning preference models. The key idea in our work is to generalize optimal designs, a methodology for computing optimal information-gathering policies, to questions with multiple answers, represented as lists of items. The policy is a distribution over lists and we elicit preferences from the list proportionally to its probability. To show the generality of our ideas, we study both absolute and ranking feedback models on items in the list. We design efficient algorithms for both and analyze them. Finally, we demonstrate that our algorithms are practical by evaluating them on existing question-answering problems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mukherjee2024optimal,
  title  = {Optimal Design for Human Preference Elicitation},
  author = {Subhojyoti Mukherjee and Anusha Lalitha and Kousha Kalantari and Aniket Deshmukh and Ge Liu and Yifei Ma and Branislav Kveton},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.13895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.52202/079017-2861},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13895v3},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.13895.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.13895)

Discussion