All You Need is Resistance: On the Equivalence of Effective Resistance and Certain Optimal Transport Problems on Graphs

Sawyer Robertson, Zhengchao Wan, Alexander Cloninger
4/23/2024
math.OCcs.DMcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The fields of effective resistance and optimal transport on graphs are filled with rich connections to combinatorics, geometry, machine learning, and beyond. In this article we put forth a bold claim: that the two fields should be understood as one and the same, up to a choice of $p$. We make this claim precise by introducing the parameterized family of $p$-Beckmann distances for probability measures on graphs and relate them sharply to certain Wasserstein distances. Then, we break open a suite of results including explicit connections to optimal stopping times and random walks on graphs, graph Sobolev spaces, and a Benamou-Brenier type formula for $2$-Beckmann distance. We further explore empirical implications in the world of unsupervised learning for graph data and propose further study of the usage of these metrics where Wasserstein distance may produce computational bottlenecks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{robertson2024need,
  title  = {All You Need is Resistance: On the Equivalence of Effective Resistance and Certain Optimal Transport Problems on Graphs},
  author = {Sawyer Robertson and Zhengchao Wan and Alexander Cloninger},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.15261},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15261v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.15261.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.15261)

Discussion