Guided AbsoluteGrad: Magnitude of Gradients Matters to Explanation's Localization and Saliency

Jun Huang, Yan Liu
4/23/2024
cs.CVcs.AIcs.HC

No official code found. Best implementation: youyinnn/Guided-AbsoluteGrad (1 star, last commit 2024-08-18).

Abstract

This paper proposes a new gradient-based XAI method called Guided AbsoluteGrad for saliency map explanations. We utilize both positive and negative gradient magnitudes and employ gradient variance to distinguish the important areas for noise deduction. We also introduce a novel evaluation metric named ReCover And Predict (RCAP), which considers the Localization and Visual Noise Level objectives of the explanations. We propose two propositions for these two objectives and prove the necessity of evaluating them. We evaluate Guided AbsoluteGrad with seven gradient-based XAI methods using the RCAP metric and other SOTA metrics in three case studies: (1) ImageNet dataset with ResNet50 model; (2) International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) dataset with EfficientNet model; (3) the Places365 dataset with DenseNet161 model. Our method surpasses other gradient-based approaches, showcasing the quality of enhanced saliency map explanations through gradient magnitude.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

This is the official implementation for Guided AbsoluteGrad. For more details, please refer to the paper Guided AbsoluteGrad: Magnitude of GradientsMatters to Explanation’s Localization and Saliency.

10Python, Jupyter NotebookApr 19, 20242 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{huang2024guided,
  title  = {Guided AbsoluteGrad: Magnitude of Gradients Matters to Explanation's Localization and Saliency},
  author = {Jun Huang and Yan Liu},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.15564},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15564v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.15564.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.15564)

Discussion