Quality Estimation with k-nearest Neighbors and Automatic Evaluation for Model-specific Quality Estimation

Tu Anh Dinh, Tobias Palzer, Jan Niehues
4/27/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Providing quality scores along with Machine Translation (MT) output, so-called reference-free Quality Estimation (QE), is crucial to inform users about the reliability of the translation. We propose a model-specific, unsupervised QE approach, termed $k$NN-QE, that extracts information from the MT model's training data using $k$-nearest neighbors. Measuring the performance of model-specific QE is not straightforward, since they provide quality scores on their own MT output, thus cannot be evaluated using benchmark QE test sets containing human quality scores on premade MT output. Therefore, we propose an automatic evaluation method that uses quality scores from reference-based metrics as gold standard instead of human-generated ones. We are the first to conduct detailed analyses and conclude that this automatic method is sufficient, and the reference-based MetricX-23 is best for the task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dinh2024quality,
  title  = {Quality Estimation with k-nearest Neighbors and Automatic Evaluation for Model-specific Quality Estimation},
  author = {Tu Anh Dinh and Tobias Palzer and Jan Niehues},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.18031},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18031v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.18031.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.18031)

Discussion