Open-Source Drift Detection Tools in Action: Insights from Two Use Cases

Rieke Müller, Mohamed Abdelaal, Davor Stjelja
4/29/2024
cs.DBcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Data drifts pose a critical challenge in the lifecycle of machine learning (ML) models, affecting their performance and reliability. In response to this challenge, we present a microbenchmark study, called D3Bench, which evaluates the efficacy of open-source drift detection tools. D3Bench examines the capabilities of Evidently AI, NannyML, and Alibi-Detect, leveraging real-world data from two smart building use cases.We prioritize assessing the functional suitability of these tools to identify and analyze data drifts. Furthermore, we consider a comprehensive set of non-functional criteria, such as the integrability with ML pipelines, the adaptability to diverse data types, user-friendliness, computational efficiency, and resource demands. Our findings reveal that Evidently AI stands out for its general data drift detection, whereas NannyML excels at pinpointing the precise timing of shifts and evaluating their consequent effects on predictive accuracy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2024opensource,
  title  = {Open-Source Drift Detection Tools in Action: Insights from Two Use Cases},
  author = {Rieke Müller and Mohamed Abdelaal and Davor Stjelja},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.18673},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18673v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.18673.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.18673)

Discussion