De-Biasing Models of Biased Decisions: A Comparison of Methods Using Mortgage Application Data

Nicholas Tenev
5/1/2024
cs.LGcs.CYecon.EM

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Prediction models can improve efficiency by automating decisions such as the approval of loan applications. However, they may inherit bias against protected groups from the data they are trained on. This paper adds counterfactual (simulated) ethnic bias to real data on mortgage application decisions, and shows that this bias is replicated by a machine learning model (XGBoost) even when ethnicity is not used as a predictive variable. Next, several other de-biasing methods are compared: averaging over prohibited variables, taking the most favorable prediction over prohibited variables (a novel method), and jointly minimizing errors as well as the association between predictions and prohibited variables. De-biasing can recover some of the original decisions, but the results are sensitive to whether the bias is effected through a proxy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tenev2024debiasing,
  title  = {De-Biasing Models of Biased Decisions: A Comparison of Methods Using Mortgage Application Data},
  author = {Nicholas Tenev},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.00910},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00910v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.00910.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.00910)

Discussion