Unifying and extending Precision Recall metrics for assessing generative models

Benjamin Sykes, Loic Simon, Julien Rabin
5/2/2024
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ME

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

With the recent success of generative models in image and text, the evaluation of generative models has gained a lot of attention. Whereas most generative models are compared in terms of scalar values such as Frechet Inception Distance (FID) or Inception Score (IS), in the last years (Sajjadi et al., 2018) proposed a definition of precision-recall curve to characterize the closeness of two distributions. Since then, various approaches to precision and recall have seen the light (Kynkaanniemi et al., 2019; Naeem et al., 2020; Park & Kim, 2023). They center their attention on the extreme values of precision and recall, but apart from this fact, their ties are elusive. In this paper, we unify most of these approaches under the same umbrella, relying on the work of (Simon et al., 2019). Doing so, we were able not only to recover entire curves, but also to expose the sources of the accounted pitfalls of the concerned metrics. We also provide consistency results that go well beyond the ones presented in the corresponding literature. Last, we study the different behaviors of the curves obtained experimentally.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sykes2024unifying,
  title  = {Unifying and extending Precision Recall metrics for assessing generative models},
  author = {Benjamin Sykes and Loic Simon and Julien Rabin},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.01611},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01611v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.01611.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.01611)

Discussion