MedReadMe: A Systematic Study for Fine-grained Sentence Readability in Medical Domain

Chao Jiang, Wei Xu
5/3/2024
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: chaojiang06/medreadme (2 stars, last commit 2025-09-02).

Abstract

Medical texts are notoriously challenging to read. Properly measuring their readability is the first step towards making them more accessible. In this paper, we present a systematic study on fine-grained readability measurements in the medical domain at both sentence-level and span-level. We introduce a new dataset MedReadMe, which consists of manually annotated readability ratings and fine-grained complex span annotation for 4,520 sentences, featuring two novel "Google-Easy" and "Google-Hard" categories. It supports our quantitative analysis, which covers 650 linguistic features and automatic complex word and jargon identification. Enabled by our high-quality annotation, we benchmark and improve several state-of-the-art sentence-level readability metrics for the medical domain specifically, which include unsupervised, supervised, and prompting-based methods using recently developed large language models (LLMs). Informed by our fine-grained complex span annotation, we find that adding a single feature, capturing the number of jargon spans, into existing readability formulas can significantly improve their correlation with human judgments. The data is available at tinyurl.com/medreadme-repo

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

website for paper "MedReadMe: A Systematic Study for Fine-grained Sentence Readability in Medical Domain"

20PythonOct 27, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jiang2024medreadme,
  title  = {MedReadMe: A Systematic Study for Fine-grained Sentence Readability in Medical Domain},
  author = {Chao Jiang and Wei Xu},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.02144},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02144v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.02144.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.02144)

Discussion