Semantic Scaling: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimates with Large Language Models

Michael Burnham
5/3/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

This paper introduces "Semantic Scaling," a novel method for ideal point estimation from text. I leverage large language models to classify documents based on their expressed stances and extract survey-like data. I then use item response theory to scale subjects from these data. Semantic Scaling significantly improves on existing text-based scaling methods, and allows researchers to explicitly define the ideological dimensions they measure. This represents the first scaling approach that allows such flexibility outside of survey instruments and opens new avenues of inquiry for populations difficult to survey. Additionally, it works with documents of varying length, and produces valid estimates of both mass and elite ideology. I demonstrate that the method can differentiate between policy preferences and in-group/out-group affect. Among the public, Semantic Scaling out-preforms Tweetscores according to human judgement; in Congress, it recaptures the first dimension DW-NOMINATE while allowing for greater flexibility in resolving construct validity challenges.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{burnham2024semantic,
  title  = {Semantic Scaling: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimates with Large Language Models},
  author = {Michael Burnham},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.02472},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02472v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.02472.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.02472)

Discussion