Astro-NER -- Astronomy Named Entity Recognition: Is GPT a Good Domain Expert Annotator?

Julia Evans, Sameer Sadruddin, Jennifer D'Souza
5/4/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IT

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this study, we address one of the challenges of developing NER models for scholarly domains, namely the scarcity of suitable labeled data. We experiment with an approach using predictions from a fine-tuned LLM model to aid non-domain experts in annotating scientific entities within astronomy literature, with the goal of uncovering whether such a collaborative process can approximate domain expertise. Our results reveal moderate agreement between a domain expert and the LLM-assisted non-experts, as well as fair agreement between the domain expert and the LLM model's predictions. In an additional experiment, we compare the performance of finetuned and default LLMs on this task. We have also introduced a specialized scientific entity annotation scheme for astronomy, validated by a domain expert. Our approach adopts a scholarly research contribution-centric perspective, focusing exclusively on scientific entities relevant to the research theme. The resultant dataset, containing 5,000 annotated astronomy article titles, is made publicly available.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{evans2024astroner,
  title  = {Astro-NER -- Astronomy Named Entity Recognition: Is GPT a Good Domain Expert Annotator?},
  author = {Julia Evans and Sameer Sadruddin and Jennifer D'Souza},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.02602},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02602v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.02602.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.02602)

Discussion