Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression

Ruicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath, Han Zhao
5/7/2024
cs.LGcs.CRcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{xian2024differentially,
  title  = {Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression},
  author = {Ruicheng Xian and Qiaobo Li and Gautam Kamath and Han Zhao},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.04034},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04034v1},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.04034.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.04034)

Discussion