Fine-tuning Protein Language Models with Deep Mutational Scanning improves Variant Effect Prediction

Aleix Lafita, Ferran Gonzalez, Mahmoud Hossam, Paul Smyth, Jacob Deasy +3 more
5/10/2024
q-bio.GNcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Protein Language Models (PLMs) have emerged as performant and scalable tools for predicting the functional impact and clinical significance of protein-coding variants, but they still lag experimental accuracy. Here, we present a novel fine-tuning approach to improve the performance of PLMs with experimental maps of variant effects from Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) assays using a Normalised Log-odds Ratio (NLR) head. We find consistent improvements in a held-out protein test set, and on independent DMS and clinical variant annotation benchmarks from ProteinGym and ClinVar. These findings demonstrate that DMS is a promising source of sequence diversity and supervised training data for improving the performance of PLMs for variant effect prediction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lafita2024finetuning,
  title  = {Fine-tuning Protein Language Models with Deep Mutational Scanning improves Variant Effect Prediction},
  author = {Aleix Lafita and Ferran Gonzalez and Mahmoud Hossam and Paul Smyth and Jacob Deasy and Ari Allyn-Feuer and Daniel Seaton and Stephen Young},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.06729},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06729v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.06729.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.06729)

Discussion