Establishing a Unified Evaluation Framework for Human Motion Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Metrics

Ali Ismail-Fawaz, Maxime Devanne, Stefano Berretti, Jonathan Weber, Germain Forestier
5/13/2024
cs.CVcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG (8 stars, GPL-3.0, last commit 2025-06-23).

Abstract

The development of generative artificial intelligence for human motion generation has expanded rapidly, necessitating a unified evaluation framework. This paper presents a detailed review of eight evaluation metrics for human motion generation, highlighting their unique features and shortcomings. We propose standardized practices through a unified evaluation setup to facilitate consistent model comparisons. Additionally, we introduce a novel metric that assesses diversity in temporal distortion by analyzing warping diversity, thereby enhancing the evaluation of temporal data. We also conduct experimental analyses of three generative models using a publicly available dataset, offering insights into the interpretation of each metric in specific case scenarios. Our goal is to offer a clear, user-friendly evaluation framework for newcomers, complemented by publicly accessible code.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

GPL-3.0

Evaluating Human Motion Generation Models

81Python, Jupyter NotebookApr 17, 20241 years agoGPL-3.0
evaluation-metricshuman-motionhuman-motion-analysishuman-motion-generationsurvey

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ismailfawaz2024establishing,
  title  = {Establishing a Unified Evaluation Framework for Human Motion Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Metrics},
  author = {Ali Ismail-Fawaz and Maxime Devanne and Stefano Berretti and Jonathan Weber and Germain Forestier},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.07680},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07680v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.07680.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.07680)

Discussion