Does Machine Bring in Extra Bias in Learning? Approximating Fairness in Models Promptly

Yijun Bian, Yujie Luo
5/15/2024
cs.LGcs.CY

No official code found. Best implementation: eustomaqua/ApproxBias (0 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-04-05).

Abstract

Providing various machine learning (ML) applications in the real world, concerns about discrimination hidden in ML models are growing, particularly in high-stakes domains. Existing techniques for assessing the discrimination level of ML models include commonly used group and individual fairness measures. However, these two types of fairness measures are usually hard to be compatible with each other, and even two different group fairness measures might be incompatible as well. To address this issue, we investigate to evaluate the discrimination level of classifiers from a manifold perspective and propose a "harmonic fairness measure via manifolds (HFM)" based on distances between sets. Yet the direct calculation of distances might be too expensive to afford, reducing its practical applicability. Therefore, we devise an approximation algorithm named "Approximation of distance between sets (ApproxDist)" to facilitate accurate estimation of distances, and we further demonstrate its algorithmic effectiveness under certain reasonable assumptions. Empirical results indicate that the proposed fairness measure HFM is valid and that the proposed ApproxDist is effective and efficient.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Does machine bring in extra bias in learning? Approximating discrimination within models quickly

00Shell, PythonAug 26, 20246 months agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bian2024does,
  title  = {Does Machine Bring in Extra Bias in Learning? Approximating Fairness in Models Promptly},
  author = {Yijun Bian and Yujie Luo},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.09251},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09251v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.09251.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.09251)

Discussion