Tight Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze
5/15/2024
cs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ CCV. We establish this result by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sinha2024tight,
  title  = {Tight Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints},
  author = {Abhishek Sinha and Rahul Vaze},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.09296},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09296v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.09296.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.09296)

Discussion