$Δ\text{-}{\rm OPE}$: Off-Policy Estimation with Pairs of Policies

Olivier Jeunen, Aleksei Ustimenko
5/16/2024
cs.LGcs.IR

No official code found. Best implementation: olivierjeunen/delta-OPE-recsys-2024 (2 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-08-14).

Abstract

The off-policy paradigm casts recommendation as a counterfactual decision-making task, allowing practitioners to unbiasedly estimate online metrics using offline data. This leads to effective evaluation metrics, as well as learning procedures that directly optimise online success. Nevertheless, the high variance that comes with unbiasedness is typically the crux that complicates practical applications. An important insight is that the difference between policy values can often be estimated with significantly reduced variance, if said policies have positive covariance. This allows us to formulate a pairwise off-policy estimation task: $Δ\text{-}{\rm OPE}$. $Δ\text{-}{\rm OPE}$ subsumes the common use-case of estimating improvements of a learnt policy over a production policy, using data collected by a stochastic logging policy. We introduce $Δ\text{-}{\rm OPE}$ methods based on the widely used Inverse Propensity Scoring estimator and its extensions. Moreover, we characterise a variance-optimal additive control variate that further enhances efficiency. Simulated, offline, and online experiments show that our methods significantly improve performance for both evaluation and learning tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT
20Python, Jupyter NotebookAug 13, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jeunen2024textrm,
  title  = {$Δ\text{-}{\rm OPE}$: Off-Policy Estimation with Pairs of Policies},
  author = {Olivier Jeunen and Aleksei Ustimenko},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.10024},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10024v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.10024.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.10024)

Discussion