LFED: A Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models

Linhao Yu, Qun Liu, Deyi Xiong
5/16/2024
cs.CLcs.PF

Official code: tjunlp-lab/LFED (1 star, MIT, last commit 2024-06-10).

Abstract

The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) has ushered in the need for comprehensive assessments of their performance across various dimensions. In this paper, we propose LFED, a Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset, which aims to evaluate the capability of LLMs on the long fiction comprehension and reasoning. We collect 95 literary fictions that are either originally written in Chinese or translated into Chinese, covering a wide range of topics across several centuries. We define a question taxonomy with 8 question categories to guide the creation of 1,304 questions. Additionally, we conduct an in-depth analysis to ascertain how specific attributes of literary fictions (e.g., novel types, character numbers, the year of publication) impact LLM performance in evaluations. Through a series of experiments with various state-of-the-art LLMs, we demonstrate that these models face considerable challenges in effectively addressing questions related to literary fictions, with ChatGPT reaching only 57.08% under the zero-shot setting. The dataset will be publicly available at https://github.com/tjunlp-lab/LFED.git

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

tjunlp-lab/LFEDOfficial100%
MIT

Source dataset of LREC-COLING 2024 paper: A Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models

10Mar 22, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yu2024lfed,
  title  = {LFED: A Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models},
  author = {Linhao Yu and Qun Liu and Deyi Xiong},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.10166},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10166v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.10166.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.10166)

Discussion