Improving the Explain-Any-Concept by Introducing Nonlinearity to the Trainable Surrogate Model

Mounes Zaval, Sedat Ozer
5/20/2024
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In the evolving field of Explainable AI (XAI), interpreting the decisions of deep neural networks (DNNs) in computer vision tasks is an important process. While pixel-based XAI methods focus on identifying significant pixels, existing concept-based XAI methods use pre-defined or human-annotated concepts. The recently proposed Segment Anything Model (SAM) achieved a significant step forward to prepare automatic concept sets via comprehensive instance segmentation. Building upon this, the Explain Any Concept (EAC) model emerged as a flexible method for explaining DNN decisions. EAC model is based on using a surrogate model which has one trainable linear layer to simulate the target model. In this paper, by introducing an additional nonlinear layer to the original surrogate model, we show that we can improve the performance of the EAC model. We compare our proposed approach to the original EAC model and report improvements obtained on both ImageNet and MS COCO datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zaval2024improving,
  title  = {Improving the Explain-Any-Concept by Introducing Nonlinearity to the Trainable Surrogate Model},
  author = {Mounes Zaval and Sedat Ozer},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.11837},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11837v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.11837.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.11837)

Discussion