Computing the Bias of Constant-step Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noise

Sebastian Allmeier, Nicolas Gast
2/3/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: ngast/paper_bias_stochastic_approximation2024 (0 stars, last commit 2024-10-25).

Abstract

We study stochastic approximation algorithms with Markovian noise and constant step-size $\alpha$. We develop a method based on infinitesimal generator comparisons to study the bias of the algorithm, which is the expected difference between $\theta_n$ -- the value at iteration $n$ -- and $\theta^*$ -- the unique equilibrium of the corresponding ODE. We show that, under some smoothness conditions, this bias is of order $O(\alpha)$. Furthermore, we show that the time-averaged bias is equal to $\alpha V + O(\alpha^2)$, where $V$ is a constant characterized by a Lyapunov equation, showing that $\mathbb{E}[\bar{\theta}_n] \approx \theta^*+V\alpha + O(\alpha^2)$, where $\bar{\theta}_n=(1/n)\sum_{k=1}^n\theta_k$ is the Polyak-Ruppert average. We also show that $\bar{\theta}_n$ converges with high probability around $\theta^*+\alpha V$. We illustrate how to combine this with Richardson-Romberg extrapolation to derive an iterative scheme with a bias of order $O(\alpha^2)$.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Paper and simulation of the NeurIPS 2024 paper "Computing the Bias of Constant-step Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noise"

00TeX, Jupyter NotebookOct 22, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{allmeier2026computing,
  title  = {Computing the Bias of Constant-step Stochastic Approximation with Markovian Noise},
  author = {Sebastian Allmeier and Nicolas Gast},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2405.14285},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2405.14285},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14285},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.14285.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.14285)

Discussion