Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch Classification

Vinod Raman, Unique Subedi, Ambuj Tewari
5/1/2024

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We study online classification under smoothed adversaries. In this setting, at each time point, the adversary draws an example from a distribution that has a bounded density with respect to a fixed base measure, which is known apriori to the learner. For binary classification and scalar-valued regression, previous works \citep{haghtalab2020smoothed, block2022smoothed} have shown that smoothed online learning is as easy as learning in the iid batch setting under PAC model. However, we show that smoothed online classification can be harder than the iid batch classification when the label space is unbounded. In particular, we construct a hypothesis class that is learnable in the iid batch setting under the PAC model but is not learnable under the smoothed online model. Finally, we identify a condition that ensures that the PAC learnability of a hypothesis class is sufficient for its smoothed online learnability.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{raman2024smoothed,
  title  = {Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch Classification},
  author = {Vinod Raman and Unique Subedi and Ambuj Tewari},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.15424},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2405.15424},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15424},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.15424.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.15424)

Discussion