Can Implicit Bias Imply Adversarial Robustness?

Hancheng Min, René Vidal
5/24/2024
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The implicit bias of gradient-based training algorithms has been considered mostly beneficial as it leads to trained networks that often generalize well. However, Frei et al. (2023) show that such implicit bias can harm adversarial robustness. Specifically, they show that if the data consists of clusters with small inter-cluster correlation, a shallow (two-layer) ReLU network trained by gradient flow generalizes well, but it is not robust to adversarial attacks of small radius. Moreover, this phenomenon occurs despite the existence of a much more robust classifier that can be explicitly constructed from a shallow network. In this paper, we extend recent analyses of neuron alignment to show that a shallow network with a polynomial ReLU activation (pReLU) trained by gradient flow not only generalizes well but is also robust to adversarial attacks. Our results highlight the importance of the interplay between data structure and architecture design in the implicit bias and robustness of trained networks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{min2024implicit,
  title  = {Can Implicit Bias Imply Adversarial Robustness?},
  author = {Hancheng Min and René Vidal},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.15942},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15942v2},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.15942.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.15942)

Discussion