Diagnosing the Compositional Knowledge of Vision Language Models from a Game-Theoretic View

Jin Wang, Shichao Dong, Yapeng Zhu, Kelu Yao, Weidong Zhao +2 more
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Compositional reasoning capabilities are usually considered as fundamental skills to characterize human perception. Recent studies show that current Vision Language Models (VLMs) surprisingly lack sufficient knowledge with respect to such capabilities. To this end, we propose to thoroughly diagnose the composition representations encoded by VLMs, systematically revealing the potential cause for this weakness. Specifically, we propose evaluation methods from a novel game-theoretic view to assess the vulnerability of VLMs on different aspects of compositional understanding, e.g., relations and attributes. Extensive experimental results demonstrate and validate several insights to understand the incapabilities of VLMs on compositional reasoning, which provide useful and reliable guidance for future studies. The deliverables will be updated at https://vlms-compositionality-gametheory.github.io/.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026diagnosing,
  title  = {Diagnosing the Compositional Knowledge of Vision Language Models from a Game-Theoretic View},
  author = {Jin Wang and Shichao Dong and Yapeng Zhu and Kelu Yao and Weidong Zhao and Chao Li and Ping Luo},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2405.17201},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17201},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.17201.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.17201)

Discussion