Cognitive Insights and Stable Coalition Matching for Fostering Multi-Agent Cooperation

Jiaqi Shao, Tianjun Yuan, Tao Lin, Bing Luo
5/28/2024
cs.MAcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Cognitive abilities, such as Theory of Mind (ToM), play a vital role in facilitating cooperation in human social interactions. However, our study reveals that agents with higher ToM abilities may not necessarily exhibit better cooperative behavior compared to those with lower ToM abilities. To address this challenge, we propose a novel matching coalition mechanism that leverages the strengths of agents with different ToM levels by explicitly considering belief alignment and specialized abilities when forming coalitions. Our proposed matching algorithm seeks to find stable coalitions that maximize the potential for cooperative behavior and ensure long-term viability. By incorporating cognitive insights into the design of multi-agent systems, our work demonstrates the potential of leveraging ToM to create more sophisticated and human-like coordination strategies that foster cooperation and improve overall system performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shao2024cognitive,
  title  = {Cognitive Insights and Stable Coalition Matching for Fostering Multi-Agent Cooperation},
  author = {Jiaqi Shao and Tianjun Yuan and Tao Lin and Bing Luo},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.18044},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18044v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.18044.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.18044)

Discussion