Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models

Donald Kridel, Jacob Dineen, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo
5/31/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) has a counterpart in analytical modeling which we refer to as model explainability. We tackle the issue of model explainability in the context of prediction models. We analyze a dataset of loans from a credit card company and apply three stages: execute and compare four different prediction methods, apply the best known explainability techniques in the current literature to the model training sets to identify feature importance (FI) (static case), and finally to cross-check whether the FI set holds up under what if prediction scenarios for continuous and categorical variables (dynamic case). We found inconsistency in FI identification between the static and dynamic cases. We summarize the state of the art in model explainability and suggest further research to advance the field.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kridel2024model,
  title  = {Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models},
  author = {Donald Kridel and Jacob Dineen and Daniel Dolk and David Castillo},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2405.20794},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20794v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2405.20794.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2405.20794)

Discussion