Scaling up Probabilistic PDE Simulators with Structured Volumetric Information

Tim Weiland, Marvin Pförtner, Philipp Hennig
6/7/2024
cs.LGmath.NA

No official code found. Best implementation: timweiland/gp-fvm (11 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-06-10).

Abstract

Modeling real-world problems with partial differential equations (PDEs) is a prominent topic in scientific machine learning. Classic solvers for this task continue to play a central role, e.g. to generate training data for deep learning analogues. Any such numerical solution is subject to multiple sources of uncertainty, both from limited computational resources and limited data (including unknown parameters). Gaussian process analogues to classic PDE simulation methods have recently emerged as a framework to construct fully probabilistic estimates of all these types of uncertainty. So far, much of this work focused on theoretical foundations, and as such is not particularly data efficient or scalable. Here we propose a framework combining a discretization scheme based on the popular Finite Volume Method with complementary numerical linear algebra techniques. Practical experiments, including a spatiotemporal tsunami simulation, demonstrate substantially improved scaling behavior of this approach over previous collocation-based techniques.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

timweiland/gp-fvmCommunity100%
MIT

Probabilistic Finite Volume Method based on Affine Gaussian Process inference

111Shell, PythonJun 7, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{weiland2024scaling,
  title  = {Scaling up Probabilistic PDE Simulators with Structured Volumetric Information},
  author = {Tim Weiland and Marvin Pförtner and Philipp Hennig},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.05020},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05020v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.05020.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.05020)

Discussion