Data-Driven Upper Confidence Bounds with Near-Optimal Regret for Heavy-Tailed Bandits

Ambrus Tamás, Szabolcs Szentpéteri, Balázs Csanád Csáji
6/9/2024
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Stochastic multi-armed bandits (MABs) provide a fundamental reinforcement learning model to study sequential decision making in uncertain environments. The upper confidence bounds (UCB) algorithm gave birth to the renaissance of bandit algorithms, as it achieves near-optimal regret rates under various moment assumptions. Up until recently most UCB methods relied on concentration inequalities leading to confidence bounds which depend on moment parameters, such as the variance proxy, that are usually unknown in practice. In this paper, we propose a new distribution-free, data-driven UCB algorithm for symmetric reward distributions, which needs no moment information. The key idea is to combine a refined, one-sided version of the recently developed resampled median-of-means (RMM) method with UCB. We prove a near-optimal regret bound for the proposed anytime, parameter-free RMM-UCB method, even for heavy-tailed distributions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tams2024datadriven,
  title  = {Data-Driven Upper Confidence Bounds with Near-Optimal Regret for Heavy-Tailed Bandits},
  author = {Ambrus Tamás and Szabolcs Szentpéteri and Balázs Csanád Csáji},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.05710},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05710v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.05710.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.05710)

Discussion