A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Improving Cross-Text Prosody Transfer

Himanshu Maurya, Atli Sigurgeirsson
6/6/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.SD

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Text-To-Speech (TTS) prosody transfer models can generate varied prosodic renditions, for the same text, by conditioning on a reference utterance. These models are trained with a reference that is identical to the target utterance. But when the reference utterance differs from the target text, as in cross-text prosody transfer, these models struggle to separate prosody from text, resulting in reduced perceived naturalness. To address this, we propose a Human-in-the-Loop (HitL) approach. HitL users adjust salient correlates of prosody to make the prosody more appropriate for the target text, while maintaining the overall reference prosodic effect. Human adjusted renditions maintain the reference prosody while being rated as more appropriate for the target text $57.8\%$ of the time. Our analysis suggests that limited user effort suffices for these improvements, and that closeness in the latent reference space is not a reliable prosodic similarity metric for the cross-text condition.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{maurya2024humanintheloop,
  title  = {A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Improving Cross-Text Prosody Transfer},
  author = {Himanshu Maurya and Atli Sigurgeirsson},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.06601},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06601v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.06601.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.06601)

Discussion