Graphical Perception of Saliency-based Model Explanations

Yayan Zhao, Mingwei Li, Matthew Berger
6/11/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In recent years, considerable work has been devoted to explaining predictive, deep learning-based models, and in turn how to evaluate explanations. An important class of evaluation methods are ones that are human-centered, which typically require the communication of explanations through visualizations. And while visualization plays a critical role in perceiving and understanding model explanations, how visualization design impacts human perception of explanations remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the graphical perception of model explanations, specifically, saliency-based explanations for visual recognition models. We propose an experimental design to investigate how human perception is influenced by visualization design, wherein we study the task of alignment assessment, or whether a saliency map aligns with an object in an image. Our findings show that factors related to visualization design decisions, the type of alignment, and qualities of the saliency map all play important roles in how humans perceive saliency-based visual explanations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhao2024graphical,
  title  = {Graphical Perception of Saliency-based Model Explanations},
  author = {Yayan Zhao and Mingwei Li and Matthew Berger},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.07702},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07702v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.07702.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.07702)

Discussion