Pcc-tuning: Breaking the Contrastive Learning Ceiling in Semantic Textual Similarity

Bowen Zhang, Chunping Li
6/14/2024
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: ZBWpro/Pcc-tuning (3 stars, last commit 2025-05-11).

Abstract

Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) constitutes a critical research direction in computational linguistics and serves as a key indicator of the encoding capabilities of embedding models. Driven by advances in pre-trained language models and contrastive learning, leading sentence representation methods have reached an average Spearman's correlation score of approximately 86 across seven STS benchmarks in SentEval. However, further progress has become increasingly marginal, with no existing method attaining an average score higher than 86.5 on these tasks. This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of this phenomenon and concludes that the upper limit for Spearman's correlation scores under contrastive learning is 87.5. To transcend this ceiling, we propose an innovative approach termed Pcc-tuning, which employs Pearson's correlation coefficient as a loss function to refine model performance beyond contrastive learning. Experimental results demonstrate that Pcc-tuning can markedly surpass previous state-of-the-art strategies with only a minimal amount of fine-grained annotated samples.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

ZBWpro/Pcc-tuningCommunity100%
31Shell, PythonOct 4, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024pcctuning,
  title  = {Pcc-tuning: Breaking the Contrastive Learning Ceiling in Semantic Textual Similarity},
  author = {Bowen Zhang and Chunping Li},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.09790},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09790v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.09790.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.09790)

Discussion