Learning Temporal Logic Predicates from Data with Statistical Guarantees

Emi Soroka, Rohan Sinha, Sanjay Lall
6/15/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.LO

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Temporal logic rules are often used in control and robotics to provide structured, human-interpretable descriptions of trajectory data. These rules have numerous applications including safety validation using formal methods, constraining motion planning among autonomous agents, and classifying data. However, existing methods for learning temporal logic predicates from data do not provide assurances about the correctness of the resulting predicate. We present a novel method to learn temporal logic predicates from data with finite-sample correctness guarantees. Our approach leverages expression optimization and conformal prediction to learn predicates that correctly describe future trajectories under mild statistical assumptions. We provide experimental results showing the performance of our approach on a simulated trajectory dataset and perform ablation studies to understand how each component of our algorithm contributes to its performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{soroka2024learning,
  title  = {Learning Temporal Logic Predicates from Data with Statistical Guarantees},
  author = {Emi Soroka and Rohan Sinha and Sanjay Lall},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.10449},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10449v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.10449.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.10449)

Discussion