fNeRF: High Quality Radiance Fields from Practical Cameras

Yi Hua, Christoph Lassner, Carsten Stoll, Iain Matthews
6/15/2024
cs.CVcs.GR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In recent years, the development of Neural Radiance Fields has enabled a previously unseen level of photo-realistic 3D reconstruction of scenes and objects from multi-view camera data. However, previous methods use an oversimplified pinhole camera model resulting in defocus blur being `baked' into the reconstructed radiance field. We propose a modification to the ray casting that leverages the optics of lenses to enhance scene reconstruction in the presence of defocus blur. This allows us to improve the quality of radiance field reconstructions from the measurements of a practical camera with finite aperture. We show that the proposed model matches the defocus blur behavior of practical cameras more closely than pinhole models and other approximations of defocus blur models, particularly in the presence of partial occlusions. This allows us to achieve sharper reconstructions, improving the PSNR on validation of all-in-focus images, on both synthetic and real datasets, by up to 3 dB.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hua2024fnerf,
  title  = {fNeRF: High Quality Radiance Fields from Practical Cameras},
  author = {Yi Hua and Christoph Lassner and Carsten Stoll and Iain Matthews},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.10633},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10633v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.10633.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.10633)

Discussion