Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI

Robert Honig, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr
2/12/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: ethz-spylab/robust-style-mimicry (56 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-06-19).

Abstract

Artists are increasingly concerned about advancements in image generation models that can closely replicate their unique artistic styles. In response, several protection tools against style mimicry have been developed that incorporate small adversarial perturbations into artworks published online. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of popular protections -- with millions of downloads -- and show they only provide a false sense of security. We find that low-effort and"off-the-shelf"techniques, such as image upscaling, are sufficient to create robust mimicry methods that significantly degrade existing protections. Through a user study, we demonstrate that all existing protections can be easily bypassed, leaving artists vulnerable to style mimicry. We caution that tools based on adversarial perturbations cannot reliably protect artists from the misuse of generative AI, and urge the development of alternative non-technological solutions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT
563PythonJun 11, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{honig2026adversarial,
  title  = {Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI},
  author = {Robert Honig and Javier Rando and Nicholas Carlini and Florian Tramèr},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2406.12027},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12027},
  journal = {ICLR 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.12027.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.12027)

Discussion