Depth F₁: Improving Evaluation of Cross-Domain Text Classification by Measuring Semantic Generalizability

Parker Seegmiller, Joseph Gatto, Sarah Masud Preum
6/20/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: pkseeg/df1 (0 stars, last commit 2024-06-20).

Abstract

Recent evaluations of cross-domain text classification models aim to measure the ability of a model to obtain domain-invariant performance in a target domain given labeled samples in a source domain. The primary strategy for this evaluation relies on assumed differences between source domain samples and target domain samples in benchmark datasets. This evaluation strategy fails to account for the similarity between source and target domains, and may mask when models fail to transfer learning to specific target samples which are highly dissimilar from the source domain. We introduce Depth $F_1$, a novel cross-domain text classification performance metric. Designed to be complementary to existing classification metrics such as $F_1$, Depth $F_1$ measures how well a model performs on target samples which are dissimilar from the source domain. We motivate this metric using standard cross-domain text classification datasets and benchmark several recent cross-domain text classification models, with the goal of enabling in-depth evaluation of the semantic generalizability of cross-domain text classification models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

pkseeg/df1Community100%
00PythonFeb 23, 20242 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{seegmiller2024depth,
  title  = {Depth F₁: Improving Evaluation of Cross-Domain Text Classification by Measuring Semantic Generalizability},
  author = {Parker Seegmiller and Joseph Gatto and Sarah Masud Preum},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.14695},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14695v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.14695.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.14695)

Discussion