Automated architectural space layout planning using a physics-inspired generative design framework

Zhipeng Li, Sichao Li, Geoff Hinchcliffe, Noam Maitless, Nick Birbilis
6/21/2024
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

The determination of space layout is one of the primary activities in the schematic design stage of an architectural project. The initial layout planning defines the shape, dimension, and circulation pattern of internal spaces; which can also affect performance and cost of the construction. When carried out manually, space layout planning can be complicated, repetitive and time consuming. In this work, a generative design framework for the automatic generation of spatial architectural layout has been developed. The proposed approach integrates a novel physics-inspired parametric model for space layout planning and an evolutionary optimisation metaheuristic. Results revealed that such a generative design framework can generate a wide variety of design suggestions at the schematic design stage, applicable to complex design problems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2024automated,
  title  = {Automated architectural space layout planning using a physics-inspired generative design framework},
  author = {Zhipeng Li and Sichao Li and Geoff Hinchcliffe and Noam Maitless and Nick Birbilis},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.14840},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14840v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.14840.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.14840)

Discussion