An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning

Kris De Asis, Richard S. Sutton
6/21/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Many reinforcement learning algorithms are built on an assumption that an agent interacts with an environment over fixed-duration, discrete time steps. However, physical systems are continuous in time, requiring a choice of time-discretization granularity when digitally controlling them. Furthermore, such systems do not wait for decisions to be made before advancing the environment state, necessitating the study of how the choice of discretization may affect a reinforcement learning algorithm. In this work, we consider the relationship between the definitions of the continuous-time and discrete-time returns. Specifically, we acknowledge an idiosyncrasy with naively applying a discrete-time algorithm to a discretized continuous-time environment, and note how a simple modification can better align the return definitions. This observation is of practical consideration when dealing with environments where time-discretization granularity is a choice, or situations where such granularity is inherently stochastic.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{asis2024idiosyncrasy,
  title  = {An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Kris De Asis and Richard S. Sutton},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.14951},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14951v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.14951.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.14951)

Discussion