Évaluation des capacités de réponse de larges modèles de langage (LLM) pour des questions d'historiens

Mathieu Chartier, Nabil Dakkoune, Guillaume Bourgeois, Stéphane Jean
6/21/2024
cs.IRcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT or Bard have revolutionized information retrieval and captivated the audience with their ability to generate custom responses in record time, regardless of the topic. In this article, we assess the capabilities of various LLMs in producing reliable, comprehensive, and sufficiently relevant responses about historical facts in French. To achieve this, we constructed a testbed comprising numerous history-related questions of varying types, themes, and levels of difficulty. Our evaluation of responses from ten selected LLMs reveals numerous shortcomings in both substance and form. Beyond an overall insufficient accuracy rate, we highlight uneven treatment of the French language, as well as issues related to verbosity and inconsistency in the responses provided by LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chartier2024valuation,
  title  = {Évaluation des capacités de réponse de larges modèles de langage (LLM) pour des questions d'historiens},
  author = {Mathieu Chartier and Nabil Dakkoune and Guillaume Bourgeois and Stéphane Jean},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.15173},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15173v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.15173.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.15173)

Discussion