The Unlikely Duel: Evaluating Creative Writing in LLMs through a Unique Scenario

Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, Paul Williams
6/22/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This is a summary of the paper "A Confederacy of Models: a Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Creative Writing", which was published in Findings of EMNLP 2023. We evaluate a range of recent state-of-the-art, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) on an English creative writing task, and compare them to human writers. For this purpose, we use a specifically-tailored prompt (based on an epic combat between Ignatius J. Reilly, main character of John Kennedy Toole's "A Confederacy of Dunces", and a pterodactyl) to minimize the risk of training data leakage and force the models to be creative rather than reusing existing stories. The same prompt is presented to LLMs and human writers, and evaluation is performed by humans using a detailed rubric including various aspects like fluency, style, originality or humor. Results show that some state-of-the-art commercial LLMs match or slightly outperform our human writers in most of the evaluated dimensions. Open-source LLMs lag behind. Humans keep a close lead in originality, and only the top three LLMs can handle humor at human-like levels.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gmezrodrguez2024unlikely,
  title  = {The Unlikely Duel: Evaluating Creative Writing in LLMs through a Unique Scenario},
  author = {Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez and Paul Williams},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.15891},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15891v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.15891.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.15891)

Discussion