Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directions

John Dickerson, Seyed A. Esmaeili, Jamie Morgenstern, Claire Jie Zhang
6/22/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Clustering is a fundamental problem in machine learning and operations research. Therefore, given the fact that fairness considerations have become of paramount importance in algorithm design, fairness in clustering has received significant attention from the research community. The literature on fair clustering has resulted in a collection of interesting fairness notions and elaborate algorithms. In this paper, we take a critical view of fair clustering, identifying a collection of ignored issues such as the lack of a clear utility characterization and the difficulty in accounting for the downstream effects of a fair clustering algorithm in machine learning settings. In some cases, we demonstrate examples where the application of a fair clustering algorithm can have significant negative impacts on social welfare. We end by identifying a collection of steps that would lead towards more impactful research in fair clustering.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dickerson2024fair,
  title  = {Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directions},
  author = {John Dickerson and Seyed A. Esmaeili and Jamie Morgenstern and Claire Jie Zhang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.15960},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15960v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.15960.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.15960)

Discussion