It's a Feature, Not a Bug: Measuring Creative Fluidity in Image Generators

Aditi Ramaswamy, Melane Navaratnarajah, Hana Chockler
6/3/2024
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

With the rise of freely available image generators, AI-generated art has become the centre of a series of heated debates, one of which concerns the concept of human creativity. Can an image generation AI exhibit ``creativity'' of the same type that artists do, and if so, how does that manifest? Our paper attempts to define and empirically measure one facet of creative behavior in AI, by conducting an experiment to quantify the "fluidity of prompt interpretation", or just "fluidity", in a series of selected popular image generators. To study fluidity, we (1) introduce a clear definition for it, (2) create chains of auto-generated prompts and images seeded with an initial "ground-truth: image, (3) measure these chains' breakage points using preexisting visual and semantic metrics, and (4) use both statistical tests and visual explanations to study these chains and determine whether the image generators used to produce them exhibit significant fluidity.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ramaswamy2024its,
  title  = {It's a Feature, Not a Bug: Measuring Creative Fluidity in Image Generators},
  author = {Aditi Ramaswamy and Melane Navaratnarajah and Hana Chockler},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.18570},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18570v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.18570.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.18570)

Discussion