Two-Step Q-Learning

Antony Vijesh, Shreyas S R
7/2/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Q-learning is a stochastic approximation version of the classic value iteration. The literature has established that Q-learning suffers from both maximization bias and slower convergence. Recently, multi-step algorithms have shown practical advantages over existing methods. This paper proposes a novel off-policy two-step Q-learning algorithms, without importance sampling. With suitable assumption it was shown that, iterates in the proposed two-step Q-learning is bounded and converges almost surely to the optimal Q-values. This study also address the convergence analysis of the smooth version of two-step Q-learning, i.e., by replacing max function with the log-sum-exp function. The proposed algorithms are robust and easy to implement. Finally, we test the proposed algorithms on benchmark problems such as the roulette problem, maximization bias problem, and randomly generated Markov decision processes and compare it with the existing methods available in literature. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superior performance of both the two-step Q-learning and its smooth variants.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{vijesh2024twostep,
  title  = {Two-Step Q-Learning},
  author = {Antony Vijesh and Shreyas S R},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.02369},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02369v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.02369.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.02369)

Discussion