Belief sharing: a blessing or a curse

Ozan Catal, Toon Van de Maele, Riddhi J. Pitliya, Mahault Albarracin, Candice Pattisapu +1 more
7/2/2024
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

When collaborating with multiple parties, communicating relevant information is of utmost importance to efficiently completing the tasks at hand. Under active inference, communication can be cast as sharing beliefs between free-energy minimizing agents, where one agent's beliefs get transformed into an observation modality for the other. However, the best approach for transforming beliefs into observations remains an open question. In this paper, we demonstrate that naively sharing posterior beliefs can give rise to the negative social dynamics of echo chambers and self-doubt. We propose an alternate belief sharing strategy which mitigates these issues.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{catal2024belief,
  title  = {Belief sharing: a blessing or a curse},
  author = {Ozan Catal and Toon Van de Maele and Riddhi J. Pitliya and Mahault Albarracin and Candice Pattisapu and Tim Verbelen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.02465},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02465v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.02465.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.02465)

Discussion