Rethinking Unsupervised Outlier Detection via Multiple Thresholding

Zhonghang Liu, Panzhong Lu, Guoyang Xie, Zhichao Lu, Wen-Yan Lin
2/14/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: zhliu-uod/Multi-T (1 star, MIT, last commit 2024-07-22).

Abstract

In the realm of unsupervised image outlier detection, assigning outlier scores holds greater significance than its subsequent task: thresholding for predicting labels. This is because determining the optimal threshold on non-separable outlier score functions is an ill-posed problem. However, the lack of predicted labels not only hiders some real applications of current outlier detectors but also causes these methods not to be enhanced by leveraging the dataset's self-supervision. To advance existing scoring methods, we propose a multiple thresholding (Multi-T) module. It generates two thresholds that isolate inliers and outliers from the unlabelled target dataset, whereas outliers are employed to obtain better feature representation while inliers provide an uncontaminated manifold. Extensive experiments verify that Multi-T can significantly improve proposed outlier scoring methods. Moreover, Multi-T contributes to a naive distance-based method being state-of-the-art.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

zhliu-uod/Multi-TCommunity100%
MIT

This is an official implement of our ECCV-24 paper: Rethinking Unsupervised Outlier Detection via Multiple Thresholding

10Python, Jupyter NotebookJul 6, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2026rethinking,
  title  = {Rethinking Unsupervised Outlier Detection via Multiple Thresholding},
  author = {Zhonghang Liu and Panzhong Lu and Guoyang Xie and Zhichao Lu and Wen-Yan Lin},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2407.05382},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05382},
  journal = {ECCV 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.05382.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.05382)

Discussion