What an Elegant Bridge: Multilingual LLMs are Biased Similarly in Different Languages

Viktor Mihaylov, Aleksandar Shtedritski
7/12/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper investigates biases of Large Language Models (LLMs) through the lens of grammatical gender. Drawing inspiration from seminal works in psycholinguistics, particularly the study of gender's influence on language perception, we leverage multilingual LLMs to revisit and expand upon the foundational experiments of Boroditsky (2003). Employing LLMs as a novel method for examining psycholinguistic biases related to grammatical gender, we prompt a model to describe nouns with adjectives in various languages, focusing specifically on languages with grammatical gender. In particular, we look at adjective co-occurrences across gender and languages, and train a binary classifier to predict grammatical gender given adjectives an LLM uses to describe a noun. Surprisingly, we find that a simple classifier can not only predict noun gender above chance but also exhibit cross-language transferability. We show that while LLMs may describe words differently in different languages, they are biased similarly.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{mihaylov2024what,
  title  = {What an Elegant Bridge: Multilingual LLMs are Biased Similarly in Different Languages},
  author = {Viktor Mihaylov and Aleksandar Shtedritski},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.09704},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09704v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.09704.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.09704)

Discussion