Conditions for Altruistic Perversity in Two-Strategy Population Games

Colton Hill, Philip N. Brown, Keith Paarporn
7/15/2024
cs.GTcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Self-interested behavior from individuals can collectively lead to poor societal outcomes. These outcomes can seemingly be improved through the actions of altruistic agents, which benefit other agents in the system. However, it is known in specific contexts that altruistic agents can actually induce worse outcomes compared to a fully selfish population -- a phenomenon we term altruistic perversity. This paper provides a holistic investigation into the necessary conditions that give rise to altruistic perversity. In particular, we study the class of two-strategy population games where one sub-population is altruistic and the other is selfish. We find that a population game can admit altruistic perversity only if the associated social welfare function is convex and the altruistic population is sufficiently large. Our results are a first step in establishing a connection between properties of nominal agent interactions and the potential impacts from altruistic behaviors.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hill2024conditions,
  title  = {Conditions for Altruistic Perversity in Two-Strategy Population Games},
  author = {Colton Hill and Philip N. Brown and Keith Paarporn},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.11250},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11250v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.11250.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.11250)

Discussion