Enhanced H-Consistency Bounds

Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong
7/18/2024
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent research has introduced a key notion of $H$-consistency bounds for surrogate losses. These bounds offer finite-sample guarantees, quantifying the relationship between the zero-one estimation error (or other target loss) and the surrogate loss estimation error for a specific hypothesis set. However, previous bounds were derived under the condition that a lower bound of the surrogate loss conditional regret is given as a convex function of the target conditional regret, without non-constant factors depending on the predictor or input instance. Can we derive finer and more favorable $H$-consistency bounds? In this work, we relax this condition and present a general framework for establishing enhanced $H$-consistency bounds based on more general inequalities relating conditional regrets. Our theorems not only subsume existing results as special cases but also enable the derivation of more favorable bounds in various scenarios. These include standard multi-class classification, binary and multi-class classification under Tsybakov noise conditions, and bipartite ranking.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mao2024enhanced,
  title  = {Enhanced H-Consistency Bounds},
  author = {Anqi Mao and Mehryar Mohri and Yutao Zhong},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.13722},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13722v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.13722.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.13722)

Discussion