Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?

James Giroux, Ariyarathne Gangani, Alexander C. Nwala, Cristiano Fanelli
7/18/2024
cs.SIcs.AIcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: wmdataphys/UncertaintyAwareBotDetection (1 star, last commit 2025-05-27).

Abstract

Social bots remain a major vector for spreading disinformation on social media and a menace to the public. Despite the progress made in developing multiple sophisticated social bot detection algorithms and tools, bot detection remains a challenging, unsolved problem that is fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity of bot behaviors, training data, and detection algorithms. Detection models often disagree on whether to label the same account as bot or human-controlled. However, they do not provide any measure of uncertainty to indicate how much we should trust their results. We propose to address both bot detection and the quantification of uncertainty at the account level - a novel feature of this research. This dual focus is crucial as it allows us to leverage additional information related to the quantified uncertainty of each prediction, thereby enhancing decision-making and improving the reliability of bot classifications. Specifically, our approach facilitates targeted interventions for bots when predictions are made with high confidence and suggests caution (e.g., gathering more data) when predictions are uncertain.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

10Python, Jupyter NotebookJul 14, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{giroux2024unmasking,
  title  = {Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?},
  author = {James Giroux and Ariyarathne Gangani and Alexander C. Nwala and Cristiano Fanelli},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.13929},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13929v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.13929.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.13929)

Discussion