Increasing the Robustness of Model Predictions to Missing Sensors in Earth Observation

Francisco Mena, Diego Arenas, Andreas Dengel
7/22/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: fmenat/mvlearning (2 stars, last commit 2025-05-07).

Abstract

Multi-sensor ML models for EO aim to enhance prediction accuracy by integrating data from various sources. However, the presence of missing data poses a significant challenge, particularly in non-persistent sensors that can be affected by external factors. Existing literature has explored strategies like temporal dropout and sensor-invariant models to address the generalization to missing data issues. Inspired by these works, we study two novel methods tailored for multi-sensor scenarios, namely Input Sensor Dropout (ISensD) and Ensemble Sensor Invariant (ESensI). Through experimentation on three multi-sensor temporal EO datasets, we demonstrate that these methods effectively increase the robustness of model predictions to missing sensors. Particularly, we focus on how the predictive performance of models drops when sensors are missing at different levels. We observe that ensemble multi-sensor models are the most robust to the lack of sensors. In addition, the sensor dropout component in ISensD shows promising robustness results.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

fmenat/mvlearningCommunity100%

Framework for different fusion strategies in multi-view learning with PyTorch

20PythonMar 20, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mena2024increasing,
  title  = {Increasing the Robustness of Model Predictions to Missing Sensors in Earth Observation},
  author = {Francisco Mena and Diego Arenas and Andreas Dengel},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.15512},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15512v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.15512.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.15512)

Discussion