Navigating Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation

Kilian Zepf, Jes Frellsen, Aasa Feragen
7/23/2024
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 9 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We address the selection and evaluation of uncertain segmentation methods in medical imaging and present two case studies: prostate segmentation, illustrating that for minimal annotator variation simple deterministic models can suffice, and lung lesion segmentation, highlighting the limitations of the Generalized Energy Distance (GED) in model selection. Our findings lead to guidelines for accurately choosing and developing uncertain segmentation models, that integrate aleatoric and epistemic components. These guidelines are designed to aid researchers and practitioners in better developing, selecting, and evaluating uncertain segmentation methods, thereby facilitating enhanced adoption and effective application of segmentation uncertainty in practice.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 9 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zepf2024navigating,
  title  = {Navigating Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation},
  author = {Kilian Zepf and Jes Frellsen and Aasa Feragen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.16367},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16367v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.16367.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.16367)

Discussion