Analyzing Speech Unit Selection for Textless Speech-to-Speech Translation

Jarod Duret, Yannick Estève, Titouan Parcollet
7/8/2024
eess.AScs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent advancements in textless speech-to-speech translation systems have been driven by the adoption of self-supervised learning techniques. Although most state-of-the-art systems adopt a similar architecture to transform source language speech into sequences of discrete representations in the target language, the criteria for selecting these target speech units remains an open question. This work explores the selection process through a study of downstream tasks such as automatic speech recognition, speech synthesis, speaker recognition, and emotion recognition. Interestingly, our findings reveal a discrepancy in the optimization of discrete speech units: units that perform well in resynthesis performance do not necessarily correlate with those that enhance translation efficacy. This discrepancy underscores the nuanced complexity of target feature selection and its impact on the overall performance of speech-to-speech translation systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{duret2024analyzing,
  title  = {Analyzing Speech Unit Selection for Textless Speech-to-Speech Translation},
  author = {Jarod Duret and Yannick Estève and Titouan Parcollet},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.18332},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18332v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.18332.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.18332)

Discussion