Practical Attribution Guidance for Rashomon Sets

Sichao Li, Amanda S. Barnard, Quanling Deng
7/26/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Different prediction models might perform equally well (Rashomon set) in the same task, but offer conflicting interpretations and conclusions about the data. The Rashomon effect in the context of Explainable AI (XAI) has been recognized as a critical factor. Although the Rashomon set has been introduced and studied in various contexts, its practical application is at its infancy stage and lacks adequate guidance and evaluation. We study the problem of the Rashomon set sampling from a practical viewpoint and identify two fundamental axioms - generalizability and implementation sparsity that exploring methods ought to satisfy in practical usage. These two axioms are not satisfied by most known attribution methods, which we consider to be a fundamental weakness. We use the norms to guide the design of an $ε$-subgradient-based sampling method. We apply this method to a fundamental mathematical problem as a proof of concept and to a set of practical datasets to demonstrate its ability compared with existing sampling methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2024practical,
  title  = {Practical Attribution Guidance for Rashomon Sets},
  author = {Sichao Li and Amanda S. Barnard and Quanling Deng},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.18482},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18482v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.18482.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.18482)

Discussion